Walk into any commercial gym on a Monday evening, and you will witness a time-honored ritual: a legion of dedicated individuals, armed with protein shakers and determined expressions, engaging in the weekly pursuit of chest development. This is “International Chest Day,” the cornerstone of the most ubiquitous training split in the world of resistance training: the Bro Split. Characterized by dedicating an entire session to a single muscle group—Chest on Monday, Back on Tuesday, Shoulders on Wednesday, Arms on Thursday, and Legs on Friday—this approach is as ingrained in gym culture as the clanging of iron plates. Its appeal is undeniable. It offers simplicity, a feeling of intense focus on one area, and the deeply satisfying, albeit temporary, muscle pump that makes you look and feel massive walking out of the gym. For decades, this has been the default blueprint for anyone looking to build a muscular physique, passed down from seasoned veterans to wide-eyed beginners like sacred scripture.
However, the world of exercise science does not stand still. While the Bro Split has been the go-to protocol, research into muscle protein synthesis (MPS), recovery, neuromuscular adaptation, and training frequency has advanced dramatically. The emerging, and now overwhelming, consensus from the scientific literature is that the traditional Bro Split is a fundamentally flawed and inefficient way to structure a training program for the vast majority of natural trainees. It is a relic of an era where anecdote outweighed evidence, often modeled after the routines of elite, genetically gifted, and pharmacologically-enhanced bodybuilders whose recovery capacities are in a different universe altogether. For the natural athlete, the individual with a job, family, and life outside the gym, this approach is suboptimal at best and a recipe for stagnation at worst.
This article will deconstruct the Bro Split, not through bro-science or gym lore, but through the lens of modern physiological understanding. We will explore the critical mechanism of muscle protein synthesis and why its fleeting nature demands more frequent stimulation. We will break down the concepts of fitness-fatigue and functional overreaching, illustrating how the Bro Split creates an undesirable seesaw of fatigue and recovery. We will delve into the immense value of skill acquisition and practice, demonstrating that performing a movement more often is the most direct path to getting better at it and lifting more weight. Furthermore, we will confront the practical realities of life—missed sessions, energy fluctuations, and the need for sustainability—and show how higher-frequency models offer unparalleled flexibility and robustness. Finally, we will provide a practical roadmap for implementing this superior approach, outlining sample splits and key principles to guide your training into a new era of efficiency and results. The Bro Split is not inherently evil; it can build muscle. But in the same way a horse and cart can get you to town, it has been overwhelmingly surpassed by more effective and efficient engines of progress. It is time to move beyond the folklore and embrace a methodology built on a foundation of science, one that acknowledges that to build a muscle more effectively, you must train it more than once a week.
1. The Science of Muscle Growth: Why MPS Demands Frequent Stimulation
To understand why the Bro Split is broken, one must first understand the fundamental biological process of muscle growth: muscle protein synthesis (MPS). MPS is the body’s process of building new muscle proteins, effectively repairing and enlarging muscle fibers in response to the damage caused by resistance training. It is the engine of hypertrophy. Crucially, MPS is not a permanent state; it is a transient spike activated by two primary stimuli: resistance exercise and protein consumption. Think of it like lighting a fire. A workout provides the spark, and protein provides the fuel, but the fire only burns for a limited time before it dies down and needs to be stoked again.
Research has consistently shown that the MPS response to a single bout of resistance exercise is remarkably short-lived. Following a strenuous training session, the elevated rate of MPS peaks around 24-48 hours and returns to baseline within 36-72 hours, even if muscle soreness (Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness or DOMS) persists. This is a critical point. The feeling of soreness is a poor indicator of the ongoing growth process. The metabolic machinery for building muscle has effectively shut down after about two to three days, waiting for the next stimulus. This creates a significant problem within the Bro Split framework. If you train chest on Monday, you spark a robust MPS response that lasts, optimistically, until Wednesday or Thursday. What then? For the remainder of the week—Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday—your chest muscles are in a metabolic steady state. They are not being actively built. You are essentially waiting for an entire week to roll around before you light the fire again. This means you are missing multiple opportunities to re-stimulate growth throughout a single week.
Contrast this with a higher-frequency approach where a muscle group is trained every 48-72 hours, such as two or even three times per week. In this model, you are effectively “pulsing” the MPS response multiple times. You train a muscle on Monday, sparking 48 hours of growth. You train it again on Wednesday or Thursday, sparking another 48 hours of growth. This simple change means that instead of your chest muscles being in a growth state for maybe 2-3 days out of a 7-day week, they are now in a growth state for 4-6 days of the week. The cumulative effect of this over weeks, months, and years is staggering. It is the difference between getting a paycheck once a month versus getting one every week; the annual income is the same, but the consistent, frequent deposits are far easier to manage and build upon, leading to more stable and continuous progress.
Furthermore, the volume of training—the total number of hard sets performed per muscle group per week—is a primary driver of hypertrophy. The Bro Split attempts to accumulate this weekly volume in one massive, crushing session. You might do 20 sets for your chest on Monday. While this can be effective, it comes with significant drawbacks. Firstly, the quality of work inevitably declines. Your first few sets are strong, but by set 15, 16, and 17, your performance is severely diminished due to fatigue. You are adding junk volume—sets that contribute more to systemic fatigue than to muscular stimulus. Secondly, this massive single-session volume creates profound localized and systemic fatigue that can hamper your performance in subsequent sessions for other body parts throughout the week. Training back the day after an annihilating chest session is compromised because your stabilizers, nervous system, and overall energy levels are depleted.
A higher-frequency model allows for a more intelligent distribution of this weekly volume. Instead of 20 sets for chest in one day, you might perform 10 sets on Monday and 10 sets on Thursday. This allows you to attack each session with higher intensity, better focus, and greater strength because you are fresher. Every set is of higher quality. You can maintain better form and push heavier weights, leading to a more potent growth stimulus per set. You also avoid the deep well of fatigue associated with marathon sessions, allowing you to perform better in your other workouts. This concept of “managing fatigue to maximize stimulus” is a cornerstone of effective programming and is almost entirely absent in the traditional Bro Split structure. By aligning your training frequency with the natural, brief lifecycle of the muscle protein synthesis process, you create a environment for continuous, sustainable growth, turning a weekly spark into a constant, smoldering fire.
2. Beyond Soreness: Fitness-Fatigue and the Power of Functional Overreaching
The Bro Split often uses muscle soreness as a primary metric for a successful workout. The mantra “if you’re not sore, you didn’t train hard enough” is a common justification for its brutality. However, this perspective confuses the process with the outcome. Soreness (DOMS) is an inflammatory response to novel or extremely intense eccentric muscle contractions. It is a sign of damage, not necessarily a precise measure of growth. While some damage is involved in the hypertrophic process, seeking extreme soreness is a counterproductive goal. This pursuit leads us to two critical concepts for understanding training adaptation: the Fitness-Fatigue Model and the principle of Functional Overreaching.
The Fitness-Fatigue Model is a conceptual framework that describes how every training session simultaneously produces two after-effects: fitness and fatigue. The “fitness” component is the positive adaptation we seek—increased strength, muscle mass, and endurance. The “fatigue” component is the negative, temporary side effect that masks that fitness. Fatigue can be neuromuscular (your muscles feel weak), metabolic (energy stores are depleted), or psychological (mental burnout). Immediately after a brutal Bro Split session, fatigue is extremely high, masking the underlying fitness gains. Over the following days, fatigue dissipates much faster than fitness, allowing the preparedness and adaptation to become visible. This is why you might feel weak and terrible the day after a hard leg day but stronger a few days later.
The problem with the Bro Split is that it creates a massive spike in fatigue relative to fitness. Those 20 sets on chest generate a tremendous amount of fatigue. This fatigue doesn’t just affect the chest; it has systemic effects that will impair your performance in your next workout, whether it’s for back or shoulders. You are constantly digging yourself into a deep fatigue hole with each session and then spending the rest of the week trying to climb out, only to jump back into another hole for a different muscle group. This creates a rollercoaster of performance where you are rarely training at your true potential because you are always carrying residual fatigue from the previous annihilation.
This is where the concept of overreaching comes in. Overreaching is a planned period of increased training stress that leads to a temporary decrease in performance. When managed correctly—this is called functional overreaching—the athlete allows for adequate recovery, leading to a supercompensation effect where performance rebounds to a level higher than before. However, the Bro Split, especially when pursued week after week, often leads to non-functional overreaching. This is a state of chronic fatigue, stagnation, and eventually, overtraining syndrome, where performance plateaus or declines and the risk of injury and illness skyrockets. The once-a-week frequency makes it easy to cross the line from productive stress into destructive stress because the immense single-session volume is so challenging to recover from fully.
Higher-frequency training flattens this rollercoaster. By distributing volume across multiple sessions, you apply a potent but manageable stimulus that generates a positive fitness response without the overwhelming fatigue spike. Each session creates a small amount of fatigue that is easily dissipated before the next session for that muscle group 2-3 days later. This allows you to operate much closer to your actual fitness potential more often. You are not constantly buried under fatigue. You can train frequently with high quality, accumulating fitness while managing fatigue. This creates a steady, upward trend in performance rather than the peaks and valleys of the Bro Split. You are no longer chasing soreness; you are chasing consistent progress, better performance, and higher-quality repetitions. The goal shifts from destroying the muscle to stimulating it effectively and repeating that process as often as recovery allows, creating a far more sustainable and productive long-term strategy.
3. The Practice Principle: How Frequency Builds Skill and Strength
A fundamental truth of human performance is that we get better at what we practice. This is as true for playing the piano as it is for performing a barbell back squat. Every lift in the gym is a skill. It requires the coordination of multiple muscle groups, the firing of motor neurons in a specific sequence, and the maintenance of proper technique under load. The neurological component of strength is immense; getting stronger isn’t just about growing bigger muscles; it’s about teaching your nervous system to more efficiently recruit the muscle fibers you already have. This is known as improving intra-muscular and inter-muscular coordination.
The Bro Split is a profound failure from a skill-acquisition standpoint. Consider the bench press, a staple of any chest day. If you are on a Bro Split, you practice the bench press once every seven days. That means you only get to practice and reinforce this complex skill 52 times a year. Now, consider a higher-frequency model like an Upper/Lower split, where you train upper body twice a week. Suddenly, you are practicing the bench press 104 times a year. Double the practice. Double the opportunity to groove the motor pattern, to feel the subtle nuances of the movement, to improve your technique, and to become more efficient and skilled at the lift. This increased skill practice has a direct and powerful carryover to strength gains. A more efficient movement pattern allows you to lift more weight with the same amount of muscular effort. Furthermore, the confidence that comes from frequent practice is a performance enhancer in itself.
The once-a-week frequency of the Bro Split means that every session for a particular lift feels almost like a re-learning process. You spend the first few sets shaking off the rust from the previous week, trying to find your groove again. By the time you are feeling technically proficient and strong, you are often already deep into your workout and accumulating fatigue. You rarely get to express your true strength potential. In contrast, training a movement every 3-4 days keeps the pattern fresh in your nervous system. You are building on the neurological adaptations from the previous session, not starting from scratch. This leads to faster strength gains, as you are effectively practicing and reinforcing the skill of being strong more often.
This practice principle extends beyond just the main lifts. It applies to all aspects of your training. Mind-muscle connection—the conscious, focused effort to feel a specific muscle working during an exercise—is a skill. The Bro Split allows you to practice the mind-muscle connection for your lats once a week. A higher-frequency model allows you to practice it multiple times a week, across different exercises like rows and pull-downs, dramatically accelerating your ability to engage the correct muscles and maximize the effectiveness of every repetition. This frequent reinforcement creates a virtuous cycle: better skill leads to more efficient lifting, which allows for greater loads and more effective stimulation, which leads to more muscle growth and strength, which further reinforces the skill. The Bro Split, with its long gaps between practice sessions, breaks this cycle, forcing you to spend valuable mental and physical energy re-acclimating instead of progressing. By embracing frequency, you are not just training your muscles; you are educating your nervous system, and that education requires consistent, repeated lessons.
4. The Practicality Problem: Why Life Gets in the Way of the Bro Split
The Bro Split is a rigid, unforgiving structure that exists in a perfect vacuum, a world where nothing ever goes wrong. It assumes you will never miss a workout, never feel overly tired, never have a work emergency, a family obligation, or simply a day where your motivation is at rock bottom. In the real world, this is a fantasy. The all-or-nothing nature of the Bro Split makes it incredibly fragile and impractical for anyone with a life outside the gym.
Imagine you are on a classic Bro Split, and you miss your designated “Leg Day” on Friday. Perhaps you had to work late, or you came down with a mild illness. The entire system breaks down. Your legs now won’t be trained for a full two weeks—from one Friday to the next—completely disrupting any training momentum and leaving a major muscle group untrained for an unacceptably long period. This single missed session can be demoralizing and can easily spiral into a longer layoff. Furthermore, if you are feeling subpar on a Wednesday but it’s your designated “Shoulder Day,” you face a terrible choice: skip the workout and disrupt the entire week’s schedule, or train anyway with low energy and poor performance, likely executing a subpar session that contributes more to fatigue than growth and increases your risk of injury.
Higher-frequency models are inherently more flexible and robust. Take a full-body routine performed three times a week, for example. If you miss a Monday session, you can simply train on Tuesday and Thursday instead. Your entire body still gets trained twice that week. The sky does not fall. The overall structure remains intact. If you have a low-energy day on a full-body day, you can often autoregulate—reduce the volume, lower the intensity, or focus on technique—and still provide a meaningful stimulus to every muscle group without grinding yourself into the ground. You haven’t “lost” a week for your chest or back; you’ve simply had a lighter day, and you can come back stronger in 48 hours.
This flexibility is crucial for long-term adherence, which is the most important factor in any successful training program. A program you can consistently execute for months and years on end will always outperform a “perfect” program that you burn out on or quit after six weeks due to its unrealistic demands. Higher-frequency training, particularly full-body or upper/lower splits, respects the realities of life. They allow for schedule changes, off days, and autoregulation without collapsing. They ensure that no single muscle group is left behind for extended periods. This practical robustness makes them a superior choice for the overwhelming majority of trainees who are balancing training with careers, families, and social lives. The goal is to make training a sustainable part of your life, not a tyrannical master that dictates your schedule and crumbles at the first sign of disruption. By moving away from the rigid, fragile structure of the Bro Split, you build a training practice that is adaptable, resilient, and built to last for the long haul.
5. Implementing the Shift: A Practical Guide to Higher Frequency Training
Understanding the theory is one thing; implementing it is another. Transitioning from a Bro Split to a higher-frequency model requires a thoughtful approach to avoid unnecessary fatigue and allow your body to adapt. The goal is to redistribute your current weekly volume, not to add to it dramatically. If you were doing 16 sets for your chest once a week on a Bro Split, you shouldn’t jump to doing 16 sets for your chest twice a week (totaling 32 sets). That is a surefire path to overtraining. Instead, you would take that 16-set weekly volume and distribute it across two or three sessions.
A sensible starting point is to begin with an Upper/Lower Split. This is arguably the most effective and popular split for natural trainees seeking a balance of frequency, volume, and recovery. An Upper/Lower split is typically run over four days per week, but it can be adapted to three or five days with a little creativity. A standard four-day version looks like this:
- Day 1: Upper Body (Focus on horizontal pushing/pulling e.g., Bench Press, Rows)
- Day 2: Lower Body (Focus on quad-dominant movements e.g., Squats, Leg Press)
- Day 3: Rest
- Day 4: Upper Body (Focus on vertical pushing/pulling e.g., Overhead Press, Pull-ups)
- Day 5: Lower Body (Focus on hip-dominant movements e.g., Deadlifts, Hip Thrusts)
- Day 6: Rest
- Day 7: Rest (or active recovery)
This structure hits each muscle group twice every seven to eight days, dramatically increasing frequency compared to the Bro Split. You can structure the two upper body days to have slightly different emphases to provide variety and ensure all muscle heads and movement patterns are trained thoroughly.
6. The Full-Body Advantage: Maximizing Frequency for the Time-Conscious Trainee
For those with even less time to dedicate to the gym, or for those who simply thrive on variety and frequent practice, the Full-Body (FB) split represents the pinnacle of training frequency. A well-designed full-body routine, performed three times per week, is arguably the most efficient and effective model for the vast majority of natural trainees, from beginners to advanced intermediates. This approach takes the principles of frequent stimulation, skill practice, and fatigue management to their logical conclusion.
A typical full-body schedule might be Monday, Wednesday, Friday, allowing for a day of recovery between each session. Each workout is structured around fundamental movement patterns: a squat pattern, a hinge pattern, a horizontal push, a horizontal pull, a vertical push, and a vertical pull. This ensures every major muscle group is stimulated in every session. The beauty of this model is its sheer efficiency. In just three weekly sessions, you are hitting every muscle group with a high frequency, providing three potent spikes of MPS per week. The metabolic demand of a full-body session is also significant, making it excellent for body composition goals.
The key to a successful full-body program is managing volume and intensity within each session. You cannot and should not attempt to annihilate every muscle group in every workout. This is where the concept of “daily undulating periodization” (DUP) shines. Instead of performing the same exercises with the same rep ranges each time, you vary the stress. For example:
- Monday (Strength Focus): Barbell Back Squat (3×5), Bench Press (3×5), Bent-Over Rows (3×5)
- Wednesday (Hypertrophy Focus): Leg Press (3×10-12), Overhead Press (3×10-12), Lat Pulldowns (3×10-12), Leg Curls (3×12-15)
- Friday (Power/Technique Focus): Deadlifts (3×3), Dumbbell Incline Press (3×8-10), Chest-Supported Rows (3×8-10), Lunges (3×10 per leg)
This variation ensures you are developing strength, muscle mass, and technique without overwhelming any single energy system or pattern in a single session. It keeps workouts fresh and engaging. The full-body approach is also incredibly robust to missed sessions. If you can only train twice in a week, you’ve still trained your entire body twice. There is no “missing” a body part. For the individual with a busy, unpredictable life, the full-body split offers the highest return on time invested and the most consistent stimulus for growth and strength gains, making it a devastatingly effective alternative to the outdated Bro Split.
7. Navigating the Transition: How to Switch Without Overtraining
The most common mistake when moving from a Bro Split to a higher-frequency model is failing to manage total weekly volume. The excitement of a new program can lead to doing too much, too soon. If you are used to performing 20 sets for chest in one day, your instinct might be to do 15 sets on each of your two new upper body days, skyrocketing your weekly volume from 20 sets to 30 sets. This is a recipe for disaster and will lead to rapid overreaching, stalled progress, and potential injury. The transition must be managed with intelligence and patience.
The first step is to audit your current Bro Split volume. Calculate the total number of hard sets you perform for each muscle group per week. Let’s say your current chest volume is 16 sets every Monday. When you move to an Upper/Lower split with two upper days, you should initially aim to split that volume, not double it. A great starting point would be 8-9 sets of chest work on each upper day, maintaining your current weekly volume of ~16-18 sets but now distributed across two sessions. This allows your body to adapt to the new frequency without being crushed by a volume it is not prepared for.
After 4-6 weeks of successful adaptation—meaning you are recovering well and making progress—you can then consider gradually adding volume if needed. This might mean adding one set to one exercise on one of your upper days. The principle of progressive overload still applies, but it must be applied cautiously when frequency increases. Pay close attention to your recovery indicators: sleep quality, energy levels, motivation, and strength in the gym. If these start to decline, you have likely added too much volume too quickly. Remember, the goal of higher frequency is to achieve a better quality of stimulus per session, not to simply accumulate more total work. Start conservative, be patient, and let your body’s response guide your next move. This careful approach ensures a smooth and productive transition that unlocks the benefits of frequency without the pitfalls of overtraining.
8. The Role of Recovery: Fueling the Frequent Fire
Training more frequently places a greater emphasis on the other 23 hours of the day. Recovery is no longer a passive process that happens over a week; it is an active and continuous necessity. When you train a muscle group every 48-72 hours, your nutrition, sleep, and stress management become non-negotiable pillars of success. You cannot fuel a higher-frequency engine with low-frequency recovery habits.
Nutrition: The goal is to provide a constant stream of building blocks for repair. This means consuming adequate protein throughout the day to maintain a positive net protein balance. Aim for 1.6-2.2 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight, distributed across 3-4 meals, each containing 30-40 grams of high-quality protein. This ensures your body has the amino acids it needs to capitalize on each MPS trigger. Total caloric intake is also crucial; to build muscle, you must be in at least a slight energy surplus. To lose fat while preserving muscle, a moderate deficit with high protein is key. Carbohydrates are essential for replenishing glycogen stores, which will be taxed more frequently, supporting training performance and recovery.
Sleep: This is the most potent recovery tool available. During deep sleep, the body releases growth hormone, which is critical for tissue repair and growth. Inadequate sleep (consistently less than 7-8 hours per night for most) disrupts hormone profiles (increasing cortisol and decreasing testosterone), impairs cognitive function and motivation, and severely hampers physical performance. Prioritizing sleep is not a luxury; it is a fundamental part of the training program. Without it, the increased frequency of training will quickly lead to burnout and regression.
Stress Management: Chronic life stress, whether from work, relationships, or other sources, elevates cortisol levels. Chronically high cortisol is catabolic—it breaks down muscle tissue—and interferes with recovery pathways. Higher-frequency training is a positive stressor (eustress), but when layered on top of high levels of chronic life stress (distress), the combined load can become overwhelming. Incorporating active recovery (walking, yoga, stretching), mindfulness practices, and hobbies outside the gym is essential for managing systemic stress and creating an internal environment conducive to growth. In the era of frequent training, what you do outside the gym is just as important as what you do inside it.
9. Who Might (Maybe) Still Benefit from a Bro Split?
While the arguments against the Bro Split for natural trainees are compelling, it would be dogmatic to claim it has zero utility for anyone. There are very specific, narrow contexts where a lower-frequency, high-volume-per-session approach might be appropriate. The first is for highly advanced bodybuilders who have maximized their genetic potential and require an extreme volume of work to stimulate any further growth. For these individuals, who are often also using performance-enhancing drugs that drastically improve recovery capacity, a single, brutal session that pushes the muscle to absolute failure and beyond might be necessary to provoke a adaptation. The subsequent long recovery period is then needed to supercompensate.
The second context is more psychological than physiological. Some individuals simply love the “body part” focus. They enjoy the deep pump and the feeling of completely exhausting one muscle group. If this psychological enjoyment is the primary factor that keeps someone consistent and adherent to their training, then a modified Bro Split is better than no training at all. However, even in this case, it can be improved. An “Upper with Chest Emphasis” day followed by an “Upper with Back Emphasis” day later in the week would be a smarter approach than a pure “Chest Only” day, as it still allows for a second hit of frequency for the entire upper body while satisfying the desire for a focus session.
For the overwhelming 95%+ of the gym-going population—natural athletes, intermediates, beginners, and those with busy lives—these exceptions do not apply. The cons of the Bro Split vastly outweigh the pros. The pursuit of a temporary pump and psychological satisfaction is a poor trade-off for slower gains, higher fatigue, less skill practice, and a fragile program structure. It is a fundamentally inefficient way to train.
Conclusion: Building a Smarter Physique
The “Bro Split” is not so much malicious as it is obsolete. It is a product of a bygone era, based on observation and emulation rather than science. Our current understanding of muscle physiology, recovery, and skill acquisition paints a clear picture: muscles grow best when stimulated frequently with high-quality work, not when they are battered into oblivion and then ignored for a week. The higher-frequency models—the Upper/Lower and Full-Body splits—are not just alternatives; they are superior frameworks for the natural trainee. They align with the biological reality of Muscle Protein Synthesis, they respect the principles of skill development and fatigue management, and they offer the practical flexibility required for a sustainable long-term practice.
Making the switch requires a shift in mindset. It means valuing consistency and quality over extremity and fatigue. It means measuring progress not by the depth of your soreness but by the slow, steady climb of the weight on the bar and the measurements on the tape. It means understanding that building a strong, resilient, and muscular physique is a marathon, not a series of weekly sprints followed by collapse. By abandoning the broken model of the Bro Split and embracing the power of frequency, you are not just changing your workout schedule; you are opting into a smarter, more efficient, and ultimately more rewarding path to achieving your strength and physique goals. The evidence is in. The tools are there. It’s time to train smarter.
SOURCES
Schoenfeld, B. J., Ogborn, D., & Krieger, J. W. (2016). Effects of resistance training frequency on measures of muscle hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 46(11), 1689-1697.
Schoenfeld, B. J., Grgic, J., & Krieger, J. (2019). How many times per week should a muscle be trained to maximize muscle hypertrophy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the effects of resistance training frequency. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37(11), 1286-1295.
Baz-Valle, E., Balsalobre-Fernández, C., Alix-Fages, C., & Santos-Concejero, J. (2022). A systematic review of the effects of different resistance training volumes on muscle hypertrophy. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 36(4), 1154-1164.
Damas, F., Angleri, V., Phillips, S. M., Soligon, S. D., Costa, L. A., & Lixandrão, M. E. (2019). Myofibrillar protein synthesis and muscle hypertrophy individualized responses to systematically changing resistance training variables in trained men. *Journal of Applied Physiology, 127**(3), 806-815.
Wackerhage, H., Schoenfeld, B. J., Hamilton, D. L., Lehti, M., & Hulmi, J. J. (2019). Stimuli and sensors that initiate skeletal muscle hypertrophy following resistance exercise. Journal of Applied Physiology, 126(1), 30-43.
Grgic, J., Schoenfeld, B. J., Skrepnik, M., Davies, T. B., & Mikulic, P. (2018). Effects of rest interval duration in resistance training on measures of muscular strength: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 48(1), 137-151.
Henselmans, M., & Schoenfeld, B. J. (2014). The effect of inter-set rest intervals on resistance exercise-induced muscle hypertrophy. Sports Medicine, 44(12), 1635-1643.
Aragon, A. A., & Schoenfeld, B. J. (2013). Nutrient timing revisited: is there a post-exercise anabolic window? Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 10(1), 5.
Morton, R. W., Murphy, K. T., McKellar, S. R., & Schoenfeld, B. J. (2018). A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 52(6), 376-384.
Cunanan, A. J., DeWeese, B. H., Wagle, J. P., & Carroll, K. M. (2018). The general adaptation syndrome: A foundation for the concept of periodization. Sports Medicine, 48(4), 787-797.
HISTORY
Current Version
SEP, 15, 2025
Written By
BARIRA MEHMOOD