Cardio Myths Busted: What You’ve Been Doing Wrong

Introduction

For decades, cardio has been the cornerstone of fitness. It’s the first thing people think of when they decide to “get in shape.” We’ve been taught that to lose weight, get healthy, and earn our meals, we must log endless miles on the treadmill, grimly chase the elusive “fat-burning zone,” and sweat through hour-long spin classes. This mindset has turned cardio into a form of penance—a grueling, monotonous punishment for indulgence, a necessary evil on the path to a better body.

But what if much of what we’ve been told about cardiovascular exercise is not just oversimplified, but fundamentally wrong? What if the very strategies you’ve been diligently following are actually hindering your progress, leading to frustration, plateaus, and even injury?

The world of fitness is riddled with myths and misconceptions, and cardio is arguably its most fertile ground. These myths persist because they often contain a kernel of truth, just enough to make them sound plausible. They are perpetuated by well-meaning but misinformed gym class teachers, outdated magazine articles, and the endless echo chamber of social media fitness influencers.

This article is your definitive guide to cutting through the noise. We are going to dismantle, deconstruct, and demolish the most pervasive cardio myths one by one. We will replace folklore with science, and outdated dogma with modern, evidence-based strategies. This is not about making cardio easier; it’s about making it smarter, more efficient, and ultimately, more effective.

Prepare to have your mind changed. We will explore why the “fat-burning zone” is a misleading concept, why more time doesn’t necessarily mean more results, how you might be undermining your hard work with your diet, and why strength training is cardio’s indispensable partner, not its rival. This journey will redefine your relationship with cardiovascular exercise, transforming it from a chore into a powerful, precise tool for achieving your health and fitness goals. Let’s begin.

Myth 1: The “Fat-Burning Zone” is the Ultimate Key to Weight Loss

If you’ve ever stepped onto a treadmill, elliptical, or stationary bike, you’ve likely seen it: a colorful chart or a setting labeled “Fat-Burning Zone.” This concept has been a staple of fitness equipment and advice for so long that it’s accepted as gospel. The theory is seductively simple: exercise at a lower intensity (typically around 55-70% of your maximum heart rate), and your body will use a higher percentage of fat as its fuel source compared to carbohydrates. Therefore, the logic follows, this is the best way to burn off unwanted body fat.

It’s time to bust this myth wide open. While the underlying physiological fact is technically true, its practical application for weight loss is almost entirely misinterpreted and ultimately, counterproductive.

The Kernel of Truth: The Fuel Source Shift

At rest and during low-intensity exercise, your body is indeed a fat-burning machine. It prefers fat as its primary fuel source because fat is a dense, slow-burning energy reserve perfect for sustained, low-demand activity. As your exercise intensity increases—say, you break into a run or start pushing hard on the bike—your body’s demand for energy skyrockets. Fat metabolism is too slow a process to keep up with this demand. Therefore, your body shifts to burning a higher percentage of carbohydrates (glycogen), which can be broken down much more rapidly to provide quick energy.

So, the chart on the treadmill is correct: at a lower intensity, a higher percentage of the calories you burn come from fat. But this is where the critical error in interpretation occurs. Percentage is not the same as total amount.

The Fatal Flaw: Ignoring Total Caloric Expenditure

Weight loss is governed by one fundamental, non-negotiable principle: energy balance. To lose fat, you must sustain a caloric deficit, meaning you burn more total calories than you consume. It doesn’t matter if those calories come from fat, carbs, or protein; a deficit is a deficit.

This is where the “Fat-Burning Zone” fails as a strategy. Let’s illustrate with a simple example:

Scenario A (The Fat-Burning Zone): You walk on a treadmill at a low intensity for 30 minutes. Your heart rate is kept firmly in the prescribed zone. Because of the low intensity, you burn 200 total calories. And because you’re in the “zone,” a high percentage—let’s say 60%—of those calories come from fat. That means you burned 120 fat calories (200 x 0.6).
Scenario B (High-Intensity): You run intervals on the treadmill for the same 30 minutes. You push hard for short bursts and recover. This workout is more demanding and burns 400 total calories. At this higher intensity, your body uses more carbs for fuel, so a lower percentage—say 40%—of the calories come from fat. That means you burned 160 fat calories (400 x 0.4).

Even though a lower percentage of calories came from fat in the high-intensity workout, the total amount of fat calories burned was higher because the overall caloric expenditure was so much greater. You burned 33% more fat calories in the same amount of time by working harder.

Furthermore, the high-intensity workout creates a powerful phenomenon known as Excess Post-Exercise Oxygen Consumption (EPOC), or the “afterburn effect.” Intense exercise creates a significant oxygen debt and metabolic disturbance that your body must repair after you’ve finished exercising. This process burns additional calories for hours—sometimes up to 24-48 hours—post-workout. This afterburn is almost negligible after a steady-state, low-intensity workout. So, when you factor in EPOC, the total fat-burning advantage of high-intensity work becomes even more pronounced.

The Right Approach: Prioritize Total Calories and Efficiency

This isn’t to say that low-intensity steady-state (LISS) cardio is worthless. It has immense value. It’s fantastic for beginners, for active recovery days, for building a base endurance, and for those who simply enjoy it as a form of movement and stress relief. The point is not to avoid it, but to stop glorifying it as the superior fat-loss tool.

The most effective cardio program for weight loss is one that prioritizes total calorie burn and time efficiency. This often means incorporating High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) or moderate-intensity sessions where you can sustain a higher overall output.

Actionable Takeaway: Don’t be a slave to the “Fat-Burning Zone” on the machine. If your goal is maximal fat loss, incorporate higher-intensity workouts to maximize total caloric burn and leverage the afterburn effect. Use low-intensity cardio for recovery, enjoyment, or active rest, not as your primary engine for weight loss.

Myth 2: More Cardio is Always Better

The logic seems infallible: if burning 300 calories in a workout is good, then burning 600 must be twice as good. If running three miles helps you lose weight, then running six miles should make you lose weight twice as fast. This “more is better” mentality drives countless individuals to spend countless hours on ellipticals, tracks, and trails, believing that duration is the primary lever for success.

This approach is not only flawed but can actively work against you, leading to a point of severely diminishing returns and potentially derailing your progress entirely. Here’s why more cardio is not always better.

The Law of Diminishing Returns

Your body is an adaptive organism, not a simple calorie-burning machine. Initially, when you start a cardio program, the results can be dramatic. You create a new stress, and your body responds by getting fitter and leaner. However, as you become more efficient at the activity—your movement economy improves, your heart gets stronger—you burn fewer calories performing the same workout. That 30-minute run that once burned 400 calories might only burn 340 calories after a few months because your body has become better at it.

To continue seeing results, you face a choice: increase the intensity or increase the duration. Most people choose duration, adding another 10 minutes, then another. This leads to a unsustainable cycle where you must constantly do more and more just to maintain the same level of results. The time commitment becomes enormous, and the payoff for each additional minute becomes smaller and smaller.

The Cortisol Conundruction: Overtraining and Stress

This is perhaps the most critical reason the “more is better” mantra fails. Prolonged, excessive cardio is a significant physical stressor. In response to this stress, your body releases the hormone cortisol.

Cortisol is not inherently evil; it’s essential for regulating energy, metabolism, and the sleep-wake cycle. Acute spikes during a workout are normal and beneficial. The problem arises with chronically elevated cortisol levels, which is exactly what happens with excessive volumes of cardio, especially when combined with a caloric deficit.

Chronically high cortisol can:

Promote Muscle Catabolism: Cortisol is catabolic, meaning it breaks down tissue. To fuel your long workouts, your body may start breaking down precious muscle protein for energy. Since muscle is metabolically active tissue (it burns calories at rest), losing muscle lowers your metabolic rate, making it harder to lose fat and easier to gain it back.
Increase Abdominal Fat Storage: High cortisol is strongly linked to the accumulation of visceral fat around the abdomen, which is associated with greater health risks.
Hinder Recovery: It disrupts sleep, suppresses immune function, and increases inflammation, making you feel rundown, sore, and increasing your risk of illness and injury.
Create Metabolic Adaptation: Your body, perceiving the high energy expenditure as a threat, may downregulate non-essential functions (like thyroid hormone production) to conserve energy, further slowing your metabolism.

In essence, too much cardio can put your body in a stressed, muscle-wasting, fat-storing state—the exact opposite of what you’re trying to achieve.

The Impact on Recovery and Performance

Recovery is where progress is made. Exercise creates micro-tears in muscle fibers and depletes energy stores; it’s during rest that your body repairs these tears, rebuilds stronger, and replenishes glycogen. If you never allow for adequate recovery because you’re constantly doing long cardio sessions, you never actually get better, stronger, or leaner. You’re just digging a deeper hole of fatigue. This leads to performance plateaus, nagging injuries, and burnout.

The Right Approach: Strategic, Not Excessive

The goal is to find the minimum effective dose—the smallest amount of exercise that will produce the desired result. This is far more sustainable and effective in the long run.

For general health and weight loss, the American Heart Association recommends at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity or 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic activity per week. This is a great starting point for health, but even for fat loss, dramatically exceeding this for months on end is rarely necessary or advisable.

Instead of just adding more time, focus on:

Increasing Intensity: A shorter, harder workout will often yield better results than a long, slow one.
Incorporating Strength Training: Building muscle increases your resting metabolism, meaning you burn more calories 24/7, negating the need for endless cardio.
Prioritizing Recovery: Understand that rest days are productive days. Sleep, nutrition, and stress management are just as important as the workout itself.

Actionable Takeaway: Stop measuring your fitness success by the hours you log. More is not better; better is better. Respect the need for recovery, be wary of the negative effects of chronic high-volume cardio, and focus on quality, strategic sessions over mindless quantity.

Myth 3: You Can Out-Cardio a Bad Diet

This is the granddaddy of all fitness myths, and it’s one that sinks more well-intentioned fitness journeys than any other. It’s the seductive belief that you can indulge in poor nutritional choices because you’ve “earned it” with a tough workout. The reality is brutally simple: you cannot outrun your fork.

The math of energy balance is ruthlessly efficient and unforgiving. Let’s break down exactly why no amount of cardio can compensate for consistent dietary missteps.

The Stark Math of Caloric Expenditure vs. Intake

Cardio burns calories, but often far fewer than people think—and far fewer than what can be consumed in moments.

A one-hour intense run for a 160-pound person might burn 600-700 calories. That is a significant effort.
Now, consider what it takes to consume that back:
- A slice of large pepperoni pizza: ~300 calories
- A medium latte with whole milk: ~200 calories
- A standard muffin: ~400 calories
- A handful of nuts or a couple of tablespoons of peanut butter: ~200 calories

It’s shockingly easy to consume 600 calories through mindless snacking or a single “reward” food. You can wipe out the entire hard-fought calorie deficit of a one-hour run in less than five minutes of eating. Furthermore, people tend to overestimate the calories they burn in exercise and underestimate the calories they consume, creating a perfect storm for weight maintenance or even gain despite regular exercise.

The Different Levers of Weight Management

Think of your fitness journey as being controlled by two primary levers:

Diet: This lever controls caloric intake. It is incredibly powerful. A small adjustment here (e.g., cutting out one soda a day) can create a 150-calorie daily deficit effortlessly.
Exercise: This lever controls caloric expenditure. It is also powerful, but it requires time and effort. Burning that same 150 calories requires about 15-20 minutes of solid effort on a treadmill.

Trying to create a large caloric deficit solely through exercise is like trying to fill a bathtub with a teaspoon while the drain is wide open. It’s an uphill battle against physics. Closing the drain (fixing your diet) is the first and most important step. Exercise is then the tool that helps you fill the tub faster and, crucially, improves the quality of the water inside (your health, body composition, and fitness).

The Type of Weight Loss Matters

Even if you somehow managed to create a deficit through heroic amounts of cardio, the type of weight loss wouldn’t be ideal. As discussed in Myth #2, excessive cardio without proper nutrition and strength training can lead to loss of muscle mass. This results in what’s often called “skinny fat”—a lower body weight but a higher body fat percentage and a less toned, metabolically slower physique.

True fitness transformation isn’t just about weight loss; it’s about fat loss and muscle preservation or gain. This is achieved through a combination of a protein-rich, calorie-appropriate diet and resistance training. Cardio is the supporting actor that improves heart health and aids the deficit, not the star of the show.

The Right Approach: Synergy, Not Compensation

The goal is to stop viewing cardio as a punishment for eating or a license to eat poorly. Instead, see nutrition and exercise as synergistic partners:

Nutrition provides the high-quality building blocks and fuel for your body.
Strength Training builds and maintains metabolically active muscle.
Cardio strengthens your most important muscle (your heart), improves endurance, and provides an additional calorie burn.

You can’t fix a bad diet with cardio, but you can absolutely amplify the results of a good diet with it.

Actionable Takeaway: Get your diet in order first. Focus on whole, minimally processed foods, adequate protein, and a caloric intake appropriate for your goals. Use cardio as a tool to enhance your health and create a slightly larger deficit, not as a get-out-of-jail-free card for unhealthy eating habits. Your results will be faster, more sustainable, and you’ll look and feel infinitely better.

Myth 4: Fasted Cardio is a Superior Fat-Loss Strategy

The theory of fasted cardio is a close cousin to the “Fat-Burning Zone” myth and is incredibly pervasive, especially in bodybuilding and hardcore fitness circles. The premise is this: do your cardio first thing in the morning on an empty stomach. Since your glycogen (stored carbohydrate) levels are low after a night of fasting, your body will be forced to tap directly into its fat stores for energy, thereby accelerating fat loss.

It sounds perfectly logical. However, as with many things in physiology, what happens in the short term within the body does not always translate to long-term, tangible results on the scale or in the mirror.

The Short-Term Physiological Truth

The proponents of fasted cardio are correct on one specific, acute point: yes, you will burn a higher percentage of fat during the workout itself. With lower circulating insulin and depleted liver glycogen, your body’s ability to use fat as fuel is heightened in that moment. Studies measuring fuel utilization during the exercise session consistently show this.

The Long-Term Practical Reality: Total Energy Balance is King

Once again, we must return to the supreme ruler of body composition change: total energy balance over time (24 hours, weeks, and months). The few extra fat calories burned during a fasted session are trivial in the grand scheme of a day.

Let’s say a study shows that in a 30-minute session, fasted cardio burns 10 additional grams of fat compared to fed cardio. That’s 90 extra fat calories. This minor difference can be completely erased by what you eat for the rest of the day. A single extra bite of food can negate it.

Furthermore, the body is highly adaptive and seeks homeostasis. If you burn a little more fat during your workout, your body may compensate by burning a little less fat later in the day, or by increasing hunger signals to drive you to replace the energy. This is why short-term measurements often fail to predict long-term outcomes.

The Potential Downsides of Fasted Cardio

For some people, fasted cardio can actually be counterproductive:

Low Energy and Poor Performance: Without available glycogen, your maximum energy output is limited. You may not be able to run as fast, cycle as hard, or push as intensely. This can lead to a lower total caloric expenditure for the session, offsetting any potential percentage-based advantage. A high-intensity fed workout will almost always burn more total calories and fat than a low-energy fasted one.
Increased Muscle Breakdown (Catabolism): In a fasted state, the body isn’t just low on glycogen; it’s also low on amino acids. To fuel your brain and provide glucose via gluconeogenesis, your body may break down amino acids from your muscle tissue. This is the exact opposite of what most people want, which is to preserve or build metabolically active muscle while losing fat.
Hunger and Overcompensation: Many people experience ravenous hunger after fasted cardio, which can lead to overeating later and making it harder to stick to a caloric deficit.

Who Might It Work For? (And It’s Not Who You Think)

Fasted cardio isn’t universally evil. It can be a useful tool for:

Very Advanced Athletes: Bodybuilders in the final stages of contest prep, who are already at extremely low body fat levels and are manipulating every minute variable, might use it to eke out every last advantage. For the general population, this is irrelevant.
Personal Preference: Some people simply feel better working out on an empty stomach and don’t experience negative side effects. For them, it’s a sustainable habit, and consistency trumps minor physiological nuances.

The Right Approach: Fed Cardio for Performance and Sustainability

For the vast majority of people, performing cardio in a fed state is a superior strategy. Having a small, easily digestible meal or snack 60-90 minutes before your workout (e.g., a banana, a piece of toast, a protein shake) provides your body with ready energy.

This allows you to:

Perform better and with higher intensity.
Burn more total calories during the session.
Protect muscle mass from breakdown.
Potentially control hunger better post-workout.

The difference in long-term fat loss between fed and fasted cardio, when calories and protein are equated, is negligible. The factor that matters most is which approach allows you to be consistent, perform well, and recover effectively.

Actionable Takeaway: Don’t stress about doing your cardio fasted. If you like it and it works for you, great. But if you find yourself dragging, unable to push the pace, or starving afterward, try having a small pre-workout snack. Focus on the big rocks: total daily calorie intake, protein consumption, and workout quality. These will have a far greater impact on your results than the timing of your food relative to your cardio.

Myth 5: Cardio Kills Your Gains (The Great Cardio vs. Strength Training Debate)

This myth has created a deep, seemingly unbridgeable chasm in the fitness world. On one side, you have the cardio enthusiasts who live on the treadmill. On the other, the iron warriors who swear that any cardio will instantly vaporize their hard-earned muscle mass. This “interference effect” is a real phenomenon studied in exercise science, but its real-world impact is wildly exaggerated for most people.

Let’s dismantle the fear and find the harmony between these two pillars of fitness.

Understanding the “Interference Effect”

The interference effect, or concurrent training, refers to the potential compromise in muscle and strength development when strength training and endurance training are performed in close proximity. The proposed physiological mechanism is logical:

Molecular Signaling Conflict: Strength training primarily activates the mTOR pathway, which signals the body to build muscle protein (anabolic). Endurance training primarily activates the AMPK pathway, which signals the body to burn fuel and improve metabolic efficiency (catabolic). AMPK can inhibit mTOR, potentially blunting the muscle-building signal.
Recovery Competition: Both types of training stress the body and require recovery resources (energy, nutrients, CNS recovery). Doing too much of both can lead to systemic fatigue, making it difficult to recover fully from either.

Why This is Overblown for 99% of the Population

The key caveat that is almost always left out of gym bro lore is that the interference effect is most pronounced in elite-level athletes who are training at the absolute limits of their capacity.

For an elite marathon runner: adding heavy squat sessions could indeed hinder their running performance because their body is specialized for endurance.
For an elite powerlifter: adding multiple long-distance runs per week could hinder their strength gains and recovery.

For the general fitness enthusiast, the beginner, the intermediate lifter, or even the advanced gym-goer who isn’t competing at the highest level, this effect is minimal to non-existent. In fact, for this population, adding the other modality is overwhelmingly beneficial.

The Immense Benefits of Combining Cardio and Strength

Improved Recovery: Light cardio on rest days (active recovery) increases blood flow, delivers nutrients to sore muscles, and can reduce DOMS (Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness), helping you get back to your strength sessions feeling better.
Enhanced Work Capacity (Conditioning): Better cardiovascular fitness means you can get through your strength workouts more efficiently. You’ll have better stamina between sets, shorter rest periods, and less overall fatigue, allowing you to maintain intensity throughout the entire session. This leads to more volume and better results over time.
Superior Body Composition: The goal for most is not to be the biggest or the fastest, but to look and feel good. Strength training builds muscle, which shapes your physique and raises your metabolism. Cardio helps burn fat, which reveals that muscle. Together, they are the most powerful combination for transforming your body.
Overall Health: Strength training builds strong bones and muscles. Cardio strengthens your heart and lungs. Why would you ever choose to neglect one of them? A complete fitness program includes both for long-term health and longevity.

How to Combine Them Intelligently (Minimizing Interference)

You can easily structure your training to get the benefits of both while minimizing any potential negative interplay.

Separate Sessions: If possible, do cardio and strength training at different times of the day (e.g., strength in the morning, light cardio in the evening) or on separate days.
Order Matters: If you must do them in the same session, perform the type of training that is your priority first. If strength is your main goal, lift weights first when you are fresh and strong. Do cardio after. If you’re training for a race, do your run first.
Modulate Intensity and Volume: You don’t need to run a marathon. For a lifter, 2-3 sessions of 20-30 minutes of moderate-intensity cardio or HIIT per week is plenty to garner health and fat-loss benefits without impeding recovery.
Fuel Appropriately: Ensure you are eating enough total calories and protein to support recovery from both activities.

Actionable Takeaway: Stop fearing cardio. It will not kill your gains unless you are an elite bodybuilder on the verge of a competition and you start running 10k every day. For everyone else, intelligently programmed cardio will enhance your results, improve your health, and help you achieve a leaner, more athletic physique. Embrace the synergy.

Myth 6: If You’re Not Drenched in Sweat, You Didn’t Work Hard Enough

Sweat is one of the most visually dramatic biomarkers of exercise. Soaking through your shirt, dripping on the floor—it feels like undeniable proof of a productive workout. This has led to the widespread belief that sweat is a direct indicator of intensity, calorie burn, and effectiveness. If you didn’t leave a puddle, you must not have pushed yourself enough.

This is a classic case of mistaking correlation for causation. Sweat is not a scorecard for your workout; it’s primarily your body’s air conditioning system.

The Actual Purpose of Sweat

Sweating is the body’s primary mechanism for thermoregulation. As your muscles contract during exercise, they generate heat, causing your core body temperature to rise. In response, your autonomic nervous system triggers sweat glands to release water onto the surface of your skin. As this sweat evaporates, it cools you down.

The amount you sweat is influenced by several factors, many of which have nothing to do with workout intensity:

Environmental Temperature and Humidity: You will sweat profusely sitting still in a hot, humid room. This doesn’t mean you’re getting a great workout; it means you’re hot. Conversely, you might have an incredibly intense workout in a cold, air-conditioned gym or outdoors on a cool day and sweat very little.
Hydration Status: If you are well-hydrated, your body can efficiently produce sweat to cool itself. If you are dehydrated, your sweat rate will decrease, which is dangerous as it impairs your cooling system.
Genetics: Some people are simply genetically predisposed to be heavy sweaters, while others are not.
Fitness Level: Counterintuitively, fitter individuals often sweat more and sooner. As you become more aerobically fit, your body becomes more efficient at thermoregulation. It learns to anticipate the rise in core temperature and starts cooling you down earlier and more effectively through increased sweat production.
Body Size: Larger individuals tend to sweat more because they generate more heat.

Why Sweat is a Misleading Metric

You can have a incredibly effective workout with minimal sweat:

A heavy, low-rep strength training session that massively challenges your nervous system and builds muscle may not make you sweat much.
A brisk walk in cool weather is fantastic for your health but won’t leave you drenched.
A short, max-effort HIIT workout on a cool day might be over before your body even has a chance to fully ramp up its cooling system.

Conversely, you can sweat buckets with minimal results:

Sitting in a sauna (you’re burning very few calories, just losing water weight).
Doing light yoga in a hot room (great for flexibility, but the sweat is due to the heat, not the intensity).
Wearing a sweat suit or garbage bags to “sweat more” (a dangerous practice that only leads to dehydration and does not increase fat loss).

Better Indicators of a Good Workout

Instead of using sweat as your guide, learn to listen to more reliable signals from your body:

Perceived Exertion: How hard did it feel? Could you have held a conversation? (The Talk Test)
Heart Rate: Were you able to get your heart rate into a desired zone for your goals?
Progressive Overload: Are you getting stronger, faster, or able to go longer over time? Are you improving your performance?
How You Feel Afterwards: Do you feel appropriately fatigued and energized, not completely wrecked?

Actionable Takeaway: Stop judging your workout by the sweat on your clothes. Hydrate properly, dress for the temperature, and focus on the actual metrics of performance: intensity, heart rate, and progressive improvement. A lack of sweat does not equal a lack of effort or results.

Conclusion: Working Smarter, Not Harder

The journey through these six myths reveals a common theme: the most effective approach to fitness is not about brute force, endless hours, or suffering through outdated protocols. It’s about intelligence, nuance, and strategy.

We’ve learned that the body doesn’t operate on simplistic rules like “burn fat in this zone” or “fasted is best.” It operates on the overarching principle of energy balance and adaptive response. The goal is to provide the right stimuli—through a combination of intelligent cardio, progressive strength training, and supportive nutrition—to guide that adaptation toward your desired outcome.

Forget the “more is better” mentality. Embrace the “smarter is better” philosophy.

Prioritize quality over quantity in your workouts.
See cardio and strength training as allies, not enemies.
Understand that nutrition is the foundation upon which all fitness results are built.
Listen to your body’s signals for exertion and recovery, not just its sweat output.

The path to lasting health and a transformed physique isn’t found in the latest fad or the most punishing routine. It’s found in consistent, sustainable habits informed by evidence and self-awareness. By busting these cardio myths, you are now equipped to train with more purpose, efficiency, and confidence. You can finally step off the hamster wheel of misinformation and start moving forward on the solid ground of science and sense.

SOURCES

Schoenfeld, B. J., & Dawes, J. (2009). High-intensity interval training: Applications for general fitness training. Strength and Conditioning Journal, *31*(6), 44-46.

Schoenfeld, B. J., Ogborn, D., & Krieger, J. W. (2017). Dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, *35*(11), 1073-1082.

Schoenfeld, B. J., Pope, Z. K., Benik, F. M., Hester, G. M., Sellers, J., Nooner, J. L., … & Krieger, J. W. (2016). Longer interset rest periods enhance muscle strength and hypertrophy in resistance-trained men. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, *30*(7), 1805-1812.

Sim, A. Y., & Burns, S. F. (2021). The effects of fasted versus fed-state exercise on fat loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, *18*(1), 1-15.

Swift, D. L., Johannsen, N. M., Lavie, C. J., Earnest, C. P., & Church, T. S. (2014). The role of exercise and physical activity in weight loss and maintenance. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, *56*(4), 441-447.

Viana, R. B., Naves, J. P. A., Coswig, V. S., de Lira, C. A. B., Steele, J., Fisher, J. P., & Gentil, P. (2019). Is interval training the magic bullet for fat loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing moderate-intensity continuous training with high-intensity interval training (HIIT). British Journal of Sports Medicine, *53*(10), 655-664.

Wewege, M., van den Berg, R., Ward, R. E., & Keech, A. (2017). The effects of high-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous training on body composition in overweight and obese adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity Reviews, *18*(6), 635-646.

Willis, L. H., Slentz, C. A., Bateman, L. A., Shields, A. T., Piner, L. W., Bales, C. W., … & Kraus, W. E. (2012). Effects of aerobic and/or resistance training on body mass and fat mass in overweight or obese adults. Journal of Applied Physiology, *113*(12), 1831-1837.

HISTORY

Current Version
AUG, 25, 2025

Written By
BARIRA MEHMOOD