For decades, the mantra for achieving optimal health, weight loss, and peak fitness has been overwhelmingly simple: do more cardio. The image of the dedicated athlete, logging countless miles on the pavement, sweating it out for hours on the elliptical, or relentlessly chasing a higher output on the stationary bike, has been enshrined as the epitome of discipline and commitment. Cardiovascular exercise is, without a doubt, one of the most powerful tools in our wellness arsenal. Its benefits are well-documented and profound, ranging from strengthening the heart and lungs to improving mood and cognitive function. However, like any powerful tool, its efficacy is entirely dependent on how it is used. A growing body of evidence, coupled with the lived experiences of countless frustrated exercisers, suggests that there is a significant point of diminishing returns. Beyond this point, a more-is-better approach can backfire spectacularly, leading to a phenomenon often colloquially termed “chronic cardio.” This term describes a specific pattern of exercise: performing long-duration, moderate-intensity cardiovascular work frequently, often at the same relentless pace, day after day, week after week, with little variation and insufficient recovery. This approach, often undertaken with the best of intentions, can inadvertently activate a series of physiological and hormonal responses that not only halt progress but can actively undermine it. This article will delve deep into the dark side of chronic cardio, moving beyond the simplistic calorie-burning narrative to explore the complex interplay between exercise, stress hormones, metabolic adaptation, and overall health. We will examine how too much of a good thing can lead to stalled weight loss, hormonal disruption, persistent fatigue, an increased risk of overuse injuries, and a frustrating phenomenon known as metabolic adaptation. This is not an indictment of cardiovascular exercise itself, but rather a crucial exploration of its unintended consequences when applied without balance, periodization, or respect for the body’s inherent need for recovery. The goal is to empower you with the knowledge to optimize your training regimen, avoid common pitfalls, and ensure that your hard work translates into the results you deserve, rather than digging yourself into a deeper hole of fatigue and frustration.
1. The Hormonal Rollercoaster: Cortisol and The Stress Response
At the heart of the chronic cardio dilemma lies the body’s central stress-response system, governed by the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and its primary effector hormone, cortisol. Cortisol is essential for life; it helps regulate energy metabolism, inflammation, and blood pressure, and it primes the body for action in the face of a threat. Exercise is a potent physiological stressor, and a controlled dose of it triggers a beneficial, adaptive release of cortisol. This acute response is a key part of how we become fitter and stronger. However, the critical distinction lies in the dose and the recovery. Chronic cardio, characterized by long, frequent sessions of sustained effort, places the body under a persistent, low-grade stress load. The body cannot differentiate between the stress of a 60-minute run and the stress of a looming work deadline; it simply perceives a threat and activates the HPA axis accordingly. When this happens repeatedly without adequate recovery, the system can become dysregulated. Instead of sharp, adaptive peaks of cortisol followed by troughs of recovery, the body enters a state of chronic, elevated cortisol. This hormonal environment is profoundly catabolic, meaning it breaks down tissue for energy. While this can include fat, it also very efficiently breaks down lean muscle mass, the very metabolic engine we strive to preserve and build. Elevated cortisol directly opposes the action of anabolic, muscle-building hormones like testosterone and growth hormone, creating a physiological state where building or maintaining muscle becomes exceedingly difficult.
Furthermore, chronically high cortisol wreaks havoc on appetite regulation and fat storage, particularly visceral fat—the dangerous fat that accumulates around the organs. Cortisol stimulates appetite and can specifically increase cravings for high-calorie, high-sugar, and high-fat foods, as the body seeks a quick energy fix to deal with the perceived ongoing emergency. This is why many endurance athletes, despite their high volume of training, often struggle with stubborn body fat and intense cravings. The hormone also promotes the storage of fat, especially in the abdominal region, by activating an enzyme called lipoprotein lipase. Perhaps most insidiously, prolonged HPA axis activation can eventually lead to a state of burnout or adrenal fatigue, where the adrenal glands can no longer produce adequate cortisol in response to stress. This state is characterized by extreme fatigue, lethargy, decreased performance, a weakened immune system, and a feeling of being “wired but tired.” The body, in a desperate attempt to conserve energy, may downregulate non-essential functions, including thyroid hormone conversion (leading to a slower metabolism) and reproductive function (manifesting as irregular periods in women and low libido in both sexes). Therefore, the very activity undertaken to improve health and body composition can, in excess, become the primary driver of a hormonal cascade that promotes muscle loss, fat gain, metabolic slowdown, and systemic exhaustion.
2. Metabolic Adaptation: When Your Body Becomes Too Efficient
The human body is a masterpiece of evolutionary adaptation, and its primary drive is efficiency and survival. When you engage in chronic cardio, you are essentially sending a consistent, powerful signal to your body to become exceptionally efficient at that specific task. This sounds positive, but from a metabolic and body composition standpoint, it can be highly counterproductive. This process is known as metabolic adaptation. The body learns to perform the same workload using less energy. It does this through several mechanisms. Neuromuscular efficiency improves, meaning your brain and muscles communicate better, requiring fewer muscle fibers to be recruited to maintain the same pace. Mitochondria, the powerhouses of your cells, become more efficient at producing energy (ATP) from fuel, meaning you burn fewer calories for the same output. The body may also become more adept at utilizing fat as a fuel source at higher intensities, which, while beneficial for endurance, means it conserves its precious glycogen stores, leading to a lower overall caloric burn during and after exercise.
This rising efficiency translates directly to a decreasing calorie burn for the exact same workout. The 5-mile run that once torched 500 calories might now only burn 400. This is a primary reason why progress plateaus. People often respond to this plateau by doing what seems logical: they run longer or more frequently, further reinforcing the adaptive signal and digging themselves deeper into the hole of efficiency. This creates a vicious cycle of having to do more and more just to maintain the same level of results, all while increasing the stress load on the body. Furthermore, this adaptive thriftiness isn’t confined to your workout hours. In a state of chronic stress and energy conservation, the body may subconsciously reduce energy expenditure throughout the rest of the day, a phenomenon known as non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT). You might fidget less, choose to sit instead of stand, take the elevator instead of the stairs—all small changes that significantly reduce your total daily energy expenditure (TDEE). This drop in NEAT can often completely offset the calories burned during the exercise session itself, making a calorie deficit impossible to achieve. The body, in its wisdom, is fighting to preserve energy stores because it perceives the constant demand of chronic cardio as a long-term threat to its energy balance. You are, in effect, training your body to be a calorie-conserving machine, the exact opposite of the goal for most people seeking weight loss or a lean, energetic physique.
3. The Muscle Catabolism Conundrum: Losing Your Metabolic Engine
One of the most detrimental yet overlooked consequences of chronic cardio is its propensity to cannibalize lean muscle tissue. As established, the catabolic hormonal environment fostered by high cortisol is a primary culprit. However, the nature of the exercise itself contributes significantly. Steady-state endurance training primarily utilizes slow-twitch muscle fibers, which are endurance-oriented but have less growth potential. The prolonged, repetitive nature of the activity, coupled with a potential calorie deficit, provides a strong signal to the body that this type of muscle is necessary, but that larger, powerful fast-twitch fibers are not. The body, in its quest for efficiency, may break down this “non-essential” muscle tissue to use as fuel or simply because maintaining it is metabolically expensive. This loss of muscle mass has profound implications. Muscle is metabolically active tissue; it burns calories at rest. Every pound of muscle lost can reduce your basal metabolic rate (BMR) by an estimated 10-20 calories per day. While this seems small, losing just five pounds of muscle could slow your metabolism by 50-100 calories per day, making it progressively harder to lose fat and easier to gain it back.
This creates a deeply frustrating paradox: you are working tirelessly, potentially eating in a deficit, but your body is becoming “softer” and less toned because you are losing the underlying muscle that gives shape and definition to your physique. The scale might be moving down, but your body fat percentage may not be improving, and you may look “skinny-fat.” This is a common outcome for those who rely exclusively on long-duration cardio for weight loss. Without a countervailing anabolic stimulus—namely, resistance training—the body has no reason to hold onto or build muscle. The repetitive, single-plane motion of most cardio activities (like running or cycling) can also lead to muscular imbalances. Certain muscles become tight and overactive (like hip flexors and calves), while others become weak and inhibited (like glutes and core stabilizers). These imbalances not only alter posture and biomechanics but also further reduce the functional capacity of the muscular system, making it less metabolically robust and more prone to injury. Preserving muscle mass is arguably the most critical factor in long-term metabolic health and successful body composition management, and chronic cardio, pursued in isolation, actively works against this fundamental goal.
4. The Overtraining Syndrome: When More Leads to Less
Chronic cardio is one of the most direct paths to non-functional overreaching and, ultimately, overtraining syndrome (OTS). OTS is a severe condition characterized by a prolonged maladaptation of the body’s physiological and psychological systems. It is not simply feeling tired after a hard week; it is a state of deep exhaustion that does not resolve with normal rest. The relentless grind of daily long cardio sessions, without adequate variation or recovery, pushes the body beyond its ability to repair itself. The initial signs are often subtle and are frequently ignored: a slight decline in performance, requiring a higher heart rate for the same pace, increased perceived exertion during normal workouts, a general feeling of heaviness and lethargy, and perhaps irritability or mood disturbances. This stage is known as functional overreaching, and with a few days of rest, the body supercompensates and becomes stronger. However, when these signals are ignored and the training load is maintained or increased, it leads to non-functional overreaching, where recovery takes weeks.
Full-blown OTS can take months or even years to recover from and is a medical condition. Its symptoms are debilitating and systemic. Physically, athletes experience persistent muscle soreness, a significant decrease in performance, an elevated resting heart rate, and frequent illnesses and infections due to a suppressed immune system. Sleep becomes disturbed, with individuals struggling to fall asleep or stay asleep despite profound fatigue. Psychologically, it manifests as depression, anxiety, a loss of motivation, and emotional instability. The hormonal disruptions are severe, with confirmed dysregulation of the HPA axis and often low levels of cortisol, testosterone, and thyroid hormones. The body essentially goes into energy conservation shutdown. For an individual seeking health and fitness, OTS is the ultimate negative outcome. It represents the complete negation of all training benefits and requires a complete cessation of exercise and a focus on restorative therapies. The risk of OTS is exceptionally high in the chronic cardio model because the repetitive stress is unvaried and the lack of strength training means the musculoskeletal system is never given a different, less systemic stimulus. The journey into OTS is a stark warning that the body’s capacity for adaptation is not infinite and that more exercise, without strategic periodization, is not better—it is destructive.
5. The Monotony and Mental Burnout Factor
The negative impact of chronic cardio is not confined to physiology; it takes a significant toll on psychological well-being and long-term exercise adherence. The monotony of performing the same activity for the same duration at the same intensity, day after day, is a recipe for mental burnout. What might start as an enjoyable hobby can quickly devolve into a tedious chore, a box that must be checked on a daily to-do list. This lack of novelty and challenge leads to a decrease in motivation and an increase in the likelihood of abandonment. The association of exercise with boredom and repetition makes it something to be avoided rather than anticipated. Furthermore, when this monotonous effort fails to yield the desired results—or worse, leads to negative outcomes like weight loss plateaus or fatigue—it fosters feelings of frustration, failure, and resentment. Individuals may begin to believe they are “broken” or that they simply need to try harder, leading them to double down on the very behavior causing the problem.
This psychological strain is compounded by the potential for exercise to become a dysfunctional or compulsive behavior. For some, chronic cardio can morph into a tool for purging calories or compensating for food intake, hallmarks of disordered eating patterns. The activity is no longer about health or performance but about anxiety management and calorie debt repayment. This creates an unhealthy, stressful relationship with both food and exercise, where self-worth becomes tied to the number on the treadmill display. The joy of movement is completely lost, replaced by a punishing obligation. This mental framework is unsustainable and antithetical to a lifelong, positive relationship with fitness. A sustainable exercise regimen must be enjoyable, varied, and flexible enough to adapt to life’s changes. Chronic cardio, by its very definition, lacks these qualities, making it a primary driver of the high dropout rates seen in exercise programs and a significant barrier to finding lasting, enjoyable ways to stay active and healthy.
6. A Balanced Approach: Strategies for Intelligent Cardio Training
Recognizing the pitfalls of chronic cardio is not a recommendation to abandon cardiovascular exercise altogether. Rather, it is a call for a more intelligent, nuanced, and balanced approach that maximizes benefits while minimizing risks. The cornerstone of this new approach is periodization—the planned variation of training variables like intensity, volume, and frequency over time. This prevents adaptation, manages fatigue, and allows for targeted peaks in performance. The most powerful tool for most individuals is to embrace high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and sprint interval training (SIT). These protocols involve short, all-out bursts of effort followed by periods of complete rest or low-intensity active recovery. A typical HIIT session on a stationary bike, for example, might consist of an 8-second sprint followed by a 12-second recovery, repeated for 20 minutes. The total work time is dramatically less than a chronic cardio session, but the metabolic and hormonal impact is far superior.
HIIT produces a significant excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) effect, meaning the body continues to burn calories at an elevated rate for many hours after the workout is over as it works to restore homeostasis. It elicits a robust anabolic hormonal response, including the release of growth hormone and catecholamines, which promote fat burning and help preserve muscle mass. Furthermore, it provides a potent stimulus for cardiovascular improvement in a fraction of the time. For the general population, replacing two or three long, steady-state sessions per week with shorter, more intense interval sessions can lead to better body composition results, improved metabolic health, and more time efficiency. Steady-state cardio still has its place, particularly as low-intensity steady-state (LISS) cardio performed at a conversational pace. This type of activity is excellent for active recovery, building a foundational aerobic base, and managing stress without significantly elevating cortisol. The key is balance. A well-designed weekly plan might include two days of strength training, one or two days of HIIT, one or two days of LISS, and at least two full days of rest or very gentle active recovery like walking or yoga. This varied approach provides a full spectrum of physiological stimuli, keeps the body guessing, prevents adaptive efficiency, and dramatically reduces the risk of overuse injuries and systemic fatigue.
7. The Non-Negotiable Role of Strength Training and Recovery
If there is a single antidote to the negative effects of chronic cardio, it is the consistent practice of resistance training. Strength training is the most powerful anabolic stimulus available. It sends a clear, unambiguous signal to the body to build and maintain muscle mass. This directly counteracts the catabolic signal of excessive cardio. More muscle mass elevates the basal metabolic rate, turning the body into a more effective calorie-burning machine 24 hours a day, completely independent of exercise. This metabolic boost can far outweigh the caloric cost of a long run. Furthermore, strength training improves bone density, enhances joint stability, corrects muscular imbalances, and improves functional capacity for all activities of daily life. For endurance athletes, it is not a hindrance but a necessity, as a stronger muscle is a more efficient and injury-resistant one. A focus on compound movements—such as squats, deadlifts, presses, and rows—that recruit large amounts of muscle mass will provide the greatest metabolic and hormonal bang for your buck.
Equally critical is the paradigm shift towards prioritizing recovery with the same intensity as training. Recovery is not passive; it is the active process during which adaptation occurs. Without it, there is no progress, only breakdown. This encompasses both daily practices and longer-term planning. Prioritizing sleep is arguably the most important recovery tool; it is during deep sleep that the body undergoes the most significant repair, and hormonal regulation occurs. Aiming for 7-9 hours of quality sleep per night is non-negotiable for serious athletes and casual exercisers alike. Nutrition is the fuel for both performance and repair. Consuming adequate protein is essential for muscle protein synthesis, while consuming enough overall calories and micronutrients supports energy levels and systemic function. Strategic nutrition around workouts can also mitigate the stress response. Finally, managing life stress is paramount. The body’s stress bucket fills from all sources—work, relationships, finances, and exercise. If the bucket is already full from life stress, adding a large volume of exercise will cause it to overflow, leading to the negative outcomes described throughout this article. Incorporating deliberate stress-reduction practices like mindfulness, meditation, walking in nature, or hobbies is not a luxury; it is a essential component of a sustainable and effective fitness regimen. By embracing strength training and elevating recovery to a pillar of your program, you create a resilient, powerful body that can handle stress, build muscle, burn fat efficiently, and perform at its best for years to come.
8. The Cardiovascular Paradox: When Exercise Harms the Heart
While moderate exercise is unequivocally cardioprotective, emerging evidence suggests that long-term, high-volume endurance training may, in some cases, lead to adverse cardiac adaptations—a phenomenon often termed the “cardiac paradox of exercise.” The extreme physiological stress of chronic, prolonged cardio can, over many years and decades, induce structural and electrical changes in the heart that, while often adaptive in the short term, may pose risks in a minority of individuals. One of the most documented adaptations is exercise-induced cardiac remodeling, which includes enlargement of the heart’s chambers, particularly the left atrium and right ventricle, and a thickening of the heart wall. For most athletes, this is a benign and efficient adaptation to handle a high cardiac output. However, in some, it can predispose them to atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate) and other arrhythmias. Studies have shown that veteran endurance athletes have a significantly higher incidence of atrial fibrillation compared to sedentary individuals and those who engage in more moderate exercise.
Furthermore, the intense physical stress of marathon running or ultra-endurance events can lead to acute cardiac strain. Blood biomarkers indicative of heart muscle damage, such as cardiac troponin, and heart failure, like B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), are frequently elevated immediately following prolonged endurance events, similar to what is seen in heart attack patients. While these levels typically normalize within days, the cumulative effect of repeated injury and repair over many years is a area of active research. There is also evidence that extreme exercise may promote coronary artery calcification (CAC) and atherosclerosis. The theory posits that the constant pounding and high cardiac output may cause micro-tears and inflammation in the arteries, which, when combined with other risk factors, could accelerate the deposition of plaque. It is crucial to contextualize these findings: the absolute risk for any individual athlete remains low, and the benefits of moderate exercise far outweigh the risks. However, for the individual engaged in chronic, high-volume cardio, it serves as another critical reason to question the “more is better” dogma and to consider a periodized, balanced approach that includes adequate recovery to allow the cardiovascular system to repair and adapt healthily.
9. The Impact on Immune Function and Inflammation
The relationship between exercise and immune function is best described by the “J-shaped curve” model. Moderate, regular exercise is a powerful booster of immune health, reducing the incidence of upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) like the common cold compared to a sedentary lifestyle. However, prolonged periods of intense endurance exercise, such as marathon training, can temporarily suppress immune function and dramatically increase the risk of infection. This open “window” of impaired immunity, which can last from 3 to 72 hours after a long, hard session, is a direct consequence of the physiological stress of chronic cardio. During and after intense prolonged exercise, levels of stress hormones like cortisol and adrenaline rise sharply. While these help mobilize energy, cortisol is particularly immunosuppressive; it reduces the number and function of key immune cells like lymphocytes, natural killer (NK) cells, and neutrophils, which are the body’s first line of defense against pathogens.
Simultaneously, the body enters a state of heightened systemic inflammation. The muscle damage from repetitive contractions releases cytokines that promote inflammation, and the gut can become more permeable (“leaky gut”), allowing endotoxins from bacteria to enter the bloodstream, further triggering a widespread inflammatory response. This combination of suppressed immune vigilance and elevated inflammation creates an ideal environment for viruses and bacteria to take hold. This is why it is common for runners to get sick immediately after a major race. For the chronic cardio enthusiast who trains hard day after day, this window of vulnerability may be perpetually open, leading to a pattern of frequent illness and constant fatigue. This not only derails training consistency but is a clear sign that the body is under too much stress and is not being given the resources or time to defend and repair itself. It is a stark physiological signal that the training load is excessive and counterproductive to the goal of overall health.
10. Reconciling the Evidence: Building a Smarter, Sustainable Plan
The evidence against chronic cardio is not a mandate for inactivity but a blueprint for optimization. The goal is to harness the profound benefits of cardiovascular exercise while deftly avoiding the pitfalls of excess. This requires a fundamental shift from a mindset focused on volume and calorie burn to one prioritizing quality, stimulus, and recovery. The first step is to honestly assess your current routine. Are you performing the same moderate-intensity cardio for the same duration most days of the week? Have you hit a progress plateau? Are you constantly tired, sick, or injured? If the answer is yes, it is time for a change. The smart approach integrates three key pillars: strategic high-intensity work, foundational low-intensity work, and mandatory strength training. High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) should form the core of your fat-loss and performance efforts, performed no more than 2-3 times per week to allow for full recovery. These sessions are short, intense, and metabolically transformative.
The majority of your cardiovascular work, however, should be composed of Low-Intensity Steady-State (LISS) cardio. Performed at a “conversational pace,” this type of exercise builds aerobic capacity, enhances metabolic flexibility, and promotes recovery without imposing a significant stress load. Walking, hiking, gentle cycling, and swimming are excellent examples. Crucially, this plan must be built upon a foundation of resistance training. Lifting weights 2-3 times per week is the most effective strategy to build and maintain muscle mass, boost basal metabolic rate, and protect the body from the catabolic effects of any cardio. Finally, this entire structure must be supported by intentional recovery. This includes scheduling at least 1-2 full rest days per week, prioritizing sleep above all else, managing life stress, and fueling the body with adequate calories and nutrients, particularly protein. By periodizing your training—cycling through phases of higher and lower intensity and volume—you continually provide a novel stimulus that promotes adaptation without leading to the maladaptation of chronic cardio. This smarter, more sustainable approach ensures that your efforts in the gym and on the road translate into lasting health, a lean physique, and longevity, rather than burnout and breakdown.
Conclusion
The narrative that endless hours of cardio are the golden path to fitness and leanness is not only outdated but is often biologically counterproductive. The phenomenon of chronic cardio reveals a critical truth in exercise science: the dose makes the poison. When applied in excessive, unvaried doses, cardiovascular exercise can trigger a cascade of negative effects, from a disruptive hormonal cortisol response and metabolic adaptation that conserves energy to the catabolic loss of metabolically precious muscle tissue. It heightens the risk of overtraining syndrome, mental burnout, immune suppression, and even potential long-term cardiovascular concerns. These outcomes represent the body’s intelligent, survival-driven response to a perceived persistent threat, not a personal failure. This understanding liberates us from the hamster wheel of perpetual motion and allows for a more sophisticated, evidence-based approach to training. The solution is to move away from a singular focus on volume and embrace a philosophy of balance and periodization. By intelligently integrating high-intensity intervals, utilizing low-intensity cardio for recovery and base building, mandating strength training to protect and build muscle, and elevating recovery to a non-negotiable pillar, we can harness the incredible benefits of exercise—improved cardiovascular health, body composition, and mental well-being—while avoiding the pitfalls that derail progress. The ultimate goal is not to endure but to thrive, building a resilient, powerful, and healthy body that is sustained not by punishment, but by intelligent practice.
SOURCES
Ahtiainen, J. P., Pakarinen, A., Kraemer, W. J., & Häkkinen, K. (2003). Acute hormonal and neuromuscular responses and recovery to forced vs. maximum repetitions multiple resistance exercises. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 24(6), 410–418.
Bouchard, C., Blair, S. N., & Haskell, W. L. (2012). Physical activity and health. Human Kinetics.
Eijsvogels, T. M., Molossi, S., Lee, D. C., Emery, M. S., & Thompson, P. D. (2016). Exercise at the extremes: the amount of exercise to reduce cardiovascular events. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 67(3), 316–329.
Kreher, J. B., & Schwartz, J. B. (2012). Overtraining syndrome: a practical guide. Sports Health, 4(2), 128–138.
La Gerche, A., & Heidbuchel, H. (2014). Can intensive exercise harm the heart? The answer lies in the individual’s response to exercise. Circulation, 130(13), 1037-1039.
Nieman, D. C., & Wentz, L. M. (2019). The compelling link between physical activity and the body’s defense system. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 8(3), 201–217.
Schoenfeld, B. J. (2013). Postexercise hypertrophic adaptations: a reexamination of the hormone hypothesis and its applicability to resistance training program design. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 27(6), 1720–1730.
Speck, R. M., Courneya, K. S., Mâsse, L. C., Duval, S., & Schmitz, K. H. (2014). An update of controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 8(2), 187-200.
Trexler, E. T., Smith-Ryan, A. E., & Norton, L. E. (2014). Metabolic adaptation to weight loss: implications for the athlete. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 11(1), 7.
Warburton, D. E., & Bredin, S. S. (2017). Health benefits of physical activity: a systematic review of current systematic reviews. Current Opinion in Cardiology, 32(5), 541-556.
Weston, K. S., Wisløff, U., & Coombes, J. S. (2014). High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(16), 1227–1234.
Wilson, J. M., & Loenneke, J. P. (2012). The effects of endurance, strength, and power training on muscle fiber type shifting. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 26(6), 1724–1729.
HISTORY
Current Version
SEP, 01, 2025
Written By
BARIRA MEHMOOD